International Science Index


9161

Enhancing Soft Skills through Peer Review Activity in a Technical Writing Class

Abstract:Peer review is an activity where students review their classmates- writing and then evaluate the content, development, unity and organization. Studies have shown that peer review activities benefit both the reviewer and the writer in developing their reading and writing skills. Furthermore, peer review activities may also enhance students- soft skills. This study was conducted to find out the benefits of peer review activity in a technical writing class based on engineering students- perceptions. The study also highlights how these benefits could improve the students- soft skills. A set of questionnaire was given to 200 undergraduate students of a technical writing course. The results of the study indicate that the activity could help improve their critical thinking skills, written and oral communication skills, as well as team work. This paper further discusses how the implications of these benefits could help enhance students- soft skills.
References:
[1] A. Levine, B. Oded, U. Connor and I. Asons. "Variation in EFL-ESL peer response,"TESL-EJ, vol.6no. 3, 2002, http://tesl-ej.org/ej23/al.html
[2] R. Mittan. "The peer review process: Harnessing students- communicative power." In D.M. Johnson & D.H. Roen (Eds.), Richness in writing: Empowering ESL students. New York: Longman, 1989, pp. 207 - 219.
[3] A. Gillam. "Learning through response." English Journal1, 1990, pp. 98 - 99.
[4] K. Mangelsdorf. "Peer reviews in the ESL classroom: What do the students think?" ELTJ, vol. 46, pp. 274 - 284.
[5] S. Roselina. "Soft skills at the Malaysian institute of higher learning."Asia Pacific Education Review, vol. 10, 2009, pp. 309 - 315.
[6] R. Bancino, and C. Zevalkink."Soft skills: The new curriculum for hardcore technical professionals." Techniques, May 2007, pp. 20 - 22.
[7] M. Nystrand. The structure of written communication: Studies in reciprocity between writers and readers.Orlando, FL: Academic Press, 1986.
[8] L. Cohen, L. Manion and K. Morrison. Research methods in education 5th Edition. London: RoutledgeFalmer, 2000.
[9] Malaysian Ministry of Higher Education. National Higher Education Action Plan 2007-2010. Putrajaya: Malaysian Ministry of Higher Education, 2007.
[10] J. Fitzgerald. "Enhancing two related thought processes: Revision in writing and critical reading." The Reading Teacher, Oct. 1989, pp. 42 - 48.
[11] J. Gousseva. "Literacy development through peer reviews in freshman composition classroom."The Internet TESL Journal, vol. 4 no.12, December 1998.
[12] I. Hairuzila, M. D. Hazadiah and A. Normah. "Integrating critical thinking and problem solving skills in the teaching of technical courses: The narrative of a Malaysian private university," in Proceeding for 2ndInternational Congress on Engineering Education, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 2010, pp. 258 - 263.
[13] A. Fatimah, M.R Noor Raha, and K. Hafizoah. "Oral communication skills for engineering students: Industry-s perspectives." Paper presented at 4th Asia TEFL International Conference, Fukuoka, Japan, 2006.
[14] F.T. Lee. "Identifying essential learning skills in students- engineering education," in Proceeding for 26th HERDSA Annual Conference, Christchurch, New Zealand, 2003, pp. 388 - 399.
[15] B. Prabhakar. "The paradox of soft skills versus technical skills in hiring."The Journal of Computer Information System, 2004.http://www.allbusiness.com/technology/1163965-1.html
[16] M.M.N, Megat Johari, A.A, Abang Abdullah, M.R, Osman, M.S, Sapuan, N. Mariun, M.S, Jaafar, H. Omar, and M.Y, Rosnah. "A new engineering education model for Malaysia." Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 18 no. 1, 2002, pp. 8 - 16.
[17] I. Hairuzila, S. Rohani, and T.L.A, Muhammad Ridhuan. "Oral communication ability in English: An essential skill for engineering graduates". Asia Pacific Journal of Educators and Education, vol. 26 no. 1. 2011, pp. 107 - 123.
[18] D.E. DeFord. "Children write to read and read to write". In D.R, Tovey& J.E. Kerber (Eds.). Roles in Literacy Learning, Newark, DE: International Reading Association, 1986, pp. 79 - 93.
[19] K.S. Goodman. What-s whole in whole language?, Portsmouth, NH: Heinle&Heinle, 1986.