Psychometric Examination of the QUEST-25: An Online Assessment of Intellectual Curiosity and Scientific Epistemology
The current study reports an examination of the QUEST-25 (Q-Assessment of Undergraduate Epistemology and Scientific Thinking) online version for assessing the dispositional attitudes toward scientific thinking and intellectual curiosity among undergraduate students. The QUEST-25 consists of scientific thinking (SIQ-25) and intellectual curiosity (ICIQ-25), which were correlated in hypothesized directions with the Religious Commitment Inventory, Curiosity and Exploration Inventory, Belief in Science scale, and measures of academic self-efficacy. Additionally, concurrent validity was established by the resulting significant differences between those identifying the centrality of religious belief in their lives and those who do not self-identify as being guided daily by religious beliefs. This study demonstrates the utility of the QUEST-25 for research, evaluation, and theory development.
 Berlyne, D. E., “A theory of human curiosity.” British Journal of Psychology, vol. 45, no. 3, 1954, pp. 180-191.
 Kazanas, S. A., Zagumny, M. J., & Clabo, K. “Inquiry-based coursework enhances students’ scientific thinking and confidence in using the scientific method.” Poster session presented at 30th Convention of the Association for Psychological Science, Mat 2018, San Francisco, CA.
 Osterhaus, C., Koerber, S., Sodian, B., “Scientific thinking in elementary school: Children’s social cognition and their epistemological understanding promote experimentation skills.” Developmental Psychology, vol. 53, no. 3, 2017, pp. 450-462.
 Zagumny, M. J. “Q-Test of Undergraduate Epistemology and Scientific Thinking: Development and testing of an assessment of scientific epistemology.” International Journal of Psychological and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 10, no. 5, 2016, pp. 1563-1569.
 W. Stephenson, “Introduction to Q-Methodology.” Operant Subjectivity, vol. 17, nos. 1/2, 1993/1994, pp. 1-13.
 “Disposition,” In Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary. Retrieved from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/disposition.
 T. Barrett, "The problem‐based learning process as finding and being in flow". Innovations in Education and Teaching International. Vol. 47, no. 2, 2010, pp. 165–174. doi:10.1080/14703291003718901.
 S. H. Wells, P. J. Warelow, K. L. Jackson, "Problem based learning (PBL): A conundrum". Contemporary Nurse. Vol. 33, no. 2, 2009, pp. 191–201. doi:10.5172/conu.2009.33.2.191 PMID 19929163.
 W. Antepohl, S. Herzig, S. "Problem-based learning versus lecture-based learning in a course of basic pharmacology: A controlled, randomized study". Medical education, vol. 33, 1991, pp. 106–113. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2923.1999.00289.x.
 Kashdan et al. “The Curiosity and Exploration Inventory-II: Development, factor structure, and psychometrics.” Journal of Research in Personality, vol. 43, no. 6, 2009, pp. 967-998.
 M. Farias, A. K. Newheiser, G. Kahane, & Z. de Toledo, “Scientific faith: Belief in science increases in the face of stress and existential anxiety.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 49, no. 6, 2013, pp. 1210-1213.
 E. L. Worthington et al, “The Religious Commitment Inventory-10: Development, refinement, and validation of a brief scale for research and counseling,” Journal of Counseling Psychology, vol. 50, no. 1, 2003, pp. 84-96.
 A. Zajacova, S. M. Lynch, & T. J. Espenshade, “Self-efficacy, stress, and academic success in college.” Research in Higher Education, vol. 46, no. 6, 2005, pp. 677-706.
 D. T. Cambell, & D. W. Fisk, “Convergent and divergent validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.” Psychological Bulletin, vol. 56, no. 2, 1959, pp. 81-105.
 R. H. Hoyle, M. J. Harris, & C. M. Judd, “Research Methods in Social Relations (8th ed),” 2009, Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
 M. J. Zagumny, 2017, “Loose the lectures: Using creative-inquiry in the social sciences,” Keynote Address at the MacroTrend Conference on Social Sciences, December 21-22, 2017, Paris, FR.