10007544

### A Partially Accelerated Life Test Planning with Competing Risks and Linear Degradation Path under Tampered Failure Rate Model

**Abstract:**In this paper, we propose a method to model the
relationship between failure time and degradation for a simple step
stress test where underlying degradation path is linear and different
causes of failure are possible. It is assumed that the intensity function
depends only on the degradation value. No assumptions are made
about the distribution of the failure times. A simple step-stress test
is used to shorten failure time of products and a tampered failure
rate (TFR) model is proposed to describe the effect of the changing
stress on the intensities. We assume that some of the products that
fail during the test have a cause of failure that is only known to
belong to a certain subset of all possible failures. This case is known
as masking. In the presence of masking, the maximum likelihood
estimates (MLEs) of the model parameters are obtained through an
expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm by treating the causes of
failure as missing values. The effect of incomplete information on the
estimation of parameters is studied through a Monte-Carlo simulation.
Finally, a real example is analyzed to illustrate the application of the
proposed methods.

**References:**

[1] V. Bagdonavicius, A. Bikelis and V. Kazakevicius, ” Statistical analysis
of linear degradation and failure time data with multiple failure modes,”
Lifetime data analysis, vol. 1, no. 10, pp. 65-81, 2004.

[2] V. Bagdonavicius, F. Haghighi and M. Nikulin, ” Statistical analysis of
general degradation path model and failure time data with multiple failure
modes,” Communications in statistics-Theory and methods, vol. 34, no.
8, pp. 1771-1791, 2005.

[3] G. Bhattacharyya and Z. Soejoeti, ” A tampered failure rate model for
step-stress accelerated life test,” Communications in statistics- Theory and
methods, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 1627-1643, 1989.

[4] R. V. Craiu and T. Duchesne,” Inference based on the EM algorithm
for the competing risk model with masked causes of failure,” Biometrika,
vol. 91, no. 3, pp. 543558, 2004.

[5] R. V. Craiu and B. Reiser,” Inference for the dependent competing risks
model with masked causes of failure,” Lifetime data analysis, vol. 12, no.
1, pp. 2133, 2006.

[6] R. V. Fan and B. Wang,” Accelerated Life Tests for Weibull Series
Systems With Masked Data,” IEEE Transactions on Reliability, vol. 60,
no. 3, pp. 557569, 2011.

[7] F. Haghighi and S. J. Bae, ” Reliability estimation from linear degradation
and failure time data with competing risks under a step-stress accelerated
degradation test,” IEEE Trans. Reliability, vol.64, no. 3, pp.960-971 ,
2015.

[8] M. Hamada, ” Bayesian analysis of step-stress accelerated life tests and
its use in planning,” Quality Engineering, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 276-282,
2015.

[9] W. Q. Meeker and L. A. Escobar, Statistical methods for reliability data.
John Wiley and Sons, 1998.

[10] W. B. Nelson, Accelerated testing: statistical models, test plans, and
data analyses. John Wiley and Sons, 2004.

[11] C. Park, ” Parameter estimation of incomplete data in competing risks
using the EM algorithm , ” IEEE Transactions on reliability, vol. 54, no.
2, pp. 282-290, 2005.

[12] A. Xu, S. Basu, and Y.A. Tang, A Full Bayesian Approach for Masked
Data in Step-Stress Accelerated Life Testing, IEEE Transactions on
Reliability, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 798–806, 2014.

[13] A. Xu, Y. Tang, and Q. Guan, Bayesian Analysis of Masked Data
in Step-Stress Accelerated Life Testing, Communications in Statistics-
Simulation and Computation, vol. 43, no. 8, pp. 2016–2030, 2014.