Scholarly Research Excellence

Digital Open Science Index

Commenced in January 2007 Frequency: Monthly Edition: International Publications Count: 29122


Select areas to restrict search in scientific publication database:
9999755
Approach for an Integrative Technology Assessment Method Combining Product Design and Manufacturing Process
Abstract:
The systematic evaluation of manufacturing technologies with regard to the potential for product designing constitutes a major challenge. Until now, conventional evaluation methods primarily consider the costs of manufacturing technologies. Thus, the potential of manufacturing technologies for achieving additional product design features is not completely captured. To compensate this deficit, final evaluations of new technologies are mainly intuitive in practice. Therefore, an additional evaluation dimension is needed which takes the potential of manufacturing technologies for specific realizable product designs into account. In this paper, we present the approach of an evaluation method for selecting manufacturing technologies with regard to their potential for product designing. This research is done within the Fraunhofer innovation cluster »AdaM« (Adaptive Manufacturing) which targets the development of resource efficient and adaptive manufacturing technology processes for complex turbomachinery components.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI):

References:

[1] G. Schuh, J. Schubert, M. Wellensiek: Model for the Valuation of a Technology Established in a Manufacturing System. 45th CIRP Conference on Manufacturing Systems 2012. Procedia CIRP 3, 2012, S. 602-607.
[2] M.E. Porter: Competitive Advantage. Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. Free Press, New York, 1985
[3] G. Schuh, D. Guo, S. Woelk, S. Ryschka, N. Schön, H. Wemhöner: Strategische Technologieplanung: Von der Strategie über die Roadmap zur Plattformentwicklung, IM+io, Heft 3, September, 2014
[4] G. Schuh et al: Handbuch Produktion und Management: Technologiemanagement. 2. Auflage, Springer Verlag, 2011
[5] F. Klocke, C. Zeppenfeld, A. Pampus, P. Mattfeld: Fertigungsbedingte Produkteigenschaften - FePro. Apprimus Verlag, Aachen, 2008.
[6] F. Piller: Mass Customization: Reflections on the State of the Concept, The International Jounral of Flexible Manufacturing Systems, 16, 313- 334, 2004
[7] G. Schuh, E. Baessler, J. Meier: Ana evaluation method fort the identification of flexible production technologies for Mass Customization in the automotive industry, International Journal of Manufacturing Technology and Management, Vol. 10, No. 4, 347-359, 2007
[8] W. Eversheim, G. Tuecks, R. Walker.: Identification and Evaluation of Flexible Manufacturing Technologies for Mass Customization, Proceedings of 2002 International CIRP Desing Seminar, May, Hong Kong, 2002
[9] G. Schuh et al.: Individualisierte Produktion, Kap. 3, Integrative Produktionstechnik für Hochlohnländer, C. Brecher (Hrsg.), Springer- Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2011
[10] G. Schuh, J. Arnoscht, A. Bohl, C. Nussbaum: Integrative assessment and configuration of production systems, CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technologie 60, 47 – 460, 2011
[11] M. Fallboehmer: Generieren alternativer Technologieketten in frühen Phasen der Produktentwicklung, Dissertation RWTH Aachen, 2000
[12] P. Hacker, G. Schuh, F. von Czerniwicz: Lifecycle Impact Profile for Efficient Product Development – Jet Engine Example, 19th CIRP International Conference on Life Cycle Engineering, Berkley, 2012
[13] G. Schuh, J. Schubert, M. Wellensiek: Framework for the valuation of a technology established in a manufacturing system. In: Khalil, T.; Hosni, Y.; Hung, S. (Hrsg.): Managing Technology-Service Convergences in a Post-Industrialized Society – Proceedings of the 21st IAMOT Conference. Taiwan, 2012,
[14] Richtlinie VDI 3780 (September 2000) Technikbewertung – Begriffe und Grundlagen
[15] R. Borsdorf: Methodischer Ansatz zur Integration von Technologiewissen in den Produktentwicklungsprozess. Dissertation RWTH Aachen, Berichte aus der Produktionstechnik, Bd. 17, Shaker Verlag, Aachen, 2007
[16] G. Trommer: Methodik zur konstruktionsbegleitenden Generierung und Bewertung alternativer Fertigungsfolgen, Dissertation RWTH Aachen, 2001
[17] G. Schuh et al: Handbuch Produktion und Management: Technologiemanagement. 2. Auflage, Springer Verlag, 2011
[18] J. Heitsch: Multidimensionale Bewertung alternativer Produktionstechniken, Dissertation, RWTH Aachen, 2000
[19] M. Kroell: Methode zur Technologiebewertung für eine ergebnisorientierte Produktentwicklung, Dissertation Universität Stuttgart, Reihe: IPA-IAO-Forschung und Praxis Nr. 468, Jost-Jetter Verlag. Stuttgart 2007
[20] H.J. Bullinger, M. Richter, M. Kröll et al.: An approach to handling risk aspects by means of technology assessment. In: Concurrent Engineering, Proceedings of the 10th ISPE International Conference on Concurrent Engineering, Madeira (Portugal), Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger, 2003.
[21] C.P.M. Glovers: What and how about quality function deployment (QFD), International Journal of Production Economics, 46 Jg., pp. 578- 581, 1996
[22] N.P. Suh: Axiomatic Design: Advances and applications, The MITPappalardo series in mechanical engineering, Oxford University Press, New York, 2001
[23] W. Pfeifer: Technologie-Portfolio zum Management strategischer Zukunftsgeschäftsfelder, 6. Aufl. Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht, Göttingen, 1991
[24] R.N. Foster: Linking R&D to strategy. McKinsey Quarterly (Winter), 35–52, 1981
[25] ISO 14040:2006 Environmental management -- Life cycle assessment -- Principles and framework, 2006
[26] T. L. Saaty: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. Pittsburg: RWS, 1990
[27] PE International: GaBi Software: Product sustainability performance, www.gabi-software.com, 2014.

Vol:12 No:12 2018Vol:12 No:11 2018Vol:12 No:10 2018Vol:12 No:09 2018Vol:12 No:08 2018Vol:12 No:07 2018Vol:12 No:06 2018Vol:12 No:05 2018Vol:12 No:04 2018Vol:12 No:03 2018Vol:12 No:02 2018Vol:12 No:01 2018
Vol:11 No:12 2017Vol:11 No:11 2017Vol:11 No:10 2017Vol:11 No:09 2017Vol:11 No:08 2017Vol:11 No:07 2017Vol:11 No:06 2017Vol:11 No:05 2017Vol:11 No:04 2017Vol:11 No:03 2017Vol:11 No:02 2017Vol:11 No:01 2017
Vol:10 No:12 2016Vol:10 No:11 2016Vol:10 No:10 2016Vol:10 No:09 2016Vol:10 No:08 2016Vol:10 No:07 2016Vol:10 No:06 2016Vol:10 No:05 2016Vol:10 No:04 2016Vol:10 No:03 2016Vol:10 No:02 2016Vol:10 No:01 2016
Vol:9 No:12 2015Vol:9 No:11 2015Vol:9 No:10 2015Vol:9 No:09 2015Vol:9 No:08 2015Vol:9 No:07 2015Vol:9 No:06 2015Vol:9 No:05 2015Vol:9 No:04 2015Vol:9 No:03 2015Vol:9 No:02 2015Vol:9 No:01 2015
Vol:8 No:12 2014Vol:8 No:11 2014Vol:8 No:10 2014Vol:8 No:09 2014Vol:8 No:08 2014Vol:8 No:07 2014Vol:8 No:06 2014Vol:8 No:05 2014Vol:8 No:04 2014Vol:8 No:03 2014Vol:8 No:02 2014Vol:8 No:01 2014
Vol:7 No:12 2013Vol:7 No:11 2013Vol:7 No:10 2013Vol:7 No:09 2013Vol:7 No:08 2013Vol:7 No:07 2013Vol:7 No:06 2013Vol:7 No:05 2013Vol:7 No:04 2013Vol:7 No:03 2013Vol:7 No:02 2013Vol:7 No:01 2013
Vol:6 No:12 2012Vol:6 No:11 2012Vol:6 No:10 2012Vol:6 No:09 2012Vol:6 No:08 2012Vol:6 No:07 2012Vol:6 No:06 2012Vol:6 No:05 2012Vol:6 No:04 2012Vol:6 No:03 2012Vol:6 No:02 2012Vol:6 No:01 2012
Vol:5 No:12 2011Vol:5 No:11 2011Vol:5 No:10 2011Vol:5 No:09 2011Vol:5 No:08 2011Vol:5 No:07 2011Vol:5 No:06 2011Vol:5 No:05 2011Vol:5 No:04 2011Vol:5 No:03 2011Vol:5 No:02 2011Vol:5 No:01 2011
Vol:4 No:12 2010Vol:4 No:11 2010Vol:4 No:10 2010Vol:4 No:09 2010Vol:4 No:08 2010Vol:4 No:07 2010Vol:4 No:06 2010Vol:4 No:05 2010Vol:4 No:04 2010Vol:4 No:03 2010Vol:4 No:02 2010Vol:4 No:01 2010
Vol:3 No:12 2009Vol:3 No:11 2009Vol:3 No:10 2009Vol:3 No:09 2009Vol:3 No:08 2009Vol:3 No:07 2009Vol:3 No:06 2009Vol:3 No:05 2009Vol:3 No:04 2009Vol:3 No:03 2009Vol:3 No:02 2009Vol:3 No:01 2009
Vol:2 No:12 2008Vol:2 No:11 2008Vol:2 No:10 2008Vol:2 No:09 2008Vol:2 No:08 2008Vol:2 No:07 2008Vol:2 No:06 2008Vol:2 No:05 2008Vol:2 No:04 2008Vol:2 No:03 2008Vol:2 No:02 2008Vol:2 No:01 2008
Vol:1 No:12 2007Vol:1 No:11 2007Vol:1 No:10 2007Vol:1 No:09 2007Vol:1 No:08 2007Vol:1 No:07 2007Vol:1 No:06 2007Vol:1 No:05 2007Vol:1 No:04 2007Vol:1 No:03 2007Vol:1 No:02 2007Vol:1 No:01 2007